https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196663 A caretaker or gratuitous occupant cannot maintain an injunction suit against the true owner where the owner's title is established on the documentary record and the occupant shows no independent right, lease, licence, or valid family arrangement. Possession held as a caretaker, agent, servant, or watchman is possession on behalf of the owner and does not create any proprietary interest or entitlement to resist recovery of possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The Court stressed careful scrutiny of pleadings and documents in injunction matters and held that due process is satisfied when rights are adjudicated by a competent court. The respondent's injunction claim was therefore not maintainable. en-us Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196663 A caretaker or gratuitous occupant cannot maintain an injunction suit against the true owner where the owner's title is established on the documentary record and the occupant shows no independent right, lease, licence, or valid family arrangement. Possession held as a caretaker, agent, servant, or watchman is possession on behalf of the owner and does not create any proprietary interest or entitlement to resist recovery of possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The Court stressed careful scrutiny of pleadings and documents in injunction matters and held that due process is satisfied when rights are adjudicated by a competent court. The respondent's injunction claim was therefore not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196663