https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196659 The Delhi Special Police Establishment could investigate notified offences in another State where that State's consent was given, and a later notification did not invalidate earlier consent for offences already covered. The constitutional and statutory scheme was also read to support the Act's application to the Union Territory of Delhi, because the adapted definition of "State" included a Union territory and Entry 80 was construed to cover a police force belonging to a Union territory. The phrase "belonging to" was understood in a territorial and functional sense, so the change from "for" to "in" did not create inconsistency. The challenge to jurisdiction and constitutional validity therefore failed. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:45:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196659 The Delhi Special Police Establishment could investigate notified offences in another State where that State's consent was given, and a later notification did not invalidate earlier consent for offences already covered. The constitutional and statutory scheme was also read to support the Act's application to the Union Territory of Delhi, because the adapted definition of "State" included a Union territory and Entry 80 was construed to cover a police force belonging to a Union territory. The phrase "belonging to" was understood in a territorial and functional sense, so the change from "for" to "in" did not create inconsistency. The challenge to jurisdiction and constitutional validity therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196659