https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196654 The court upheld the State's authority to seal the business premises based on complaints and investor protection concerns. It found the petitioners' schemes to be collective investment schemes requiring SEBI registration, directing SEBI to conclude its inquiry promptly. The court refused to unseal the premises, considering the need to protect investors, but allowed the petitioners to challenge any adverse orders following SEBI's investigation. en-us Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:15:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196654 The court upheld the State's authority to seal the business premises based on complaints and investor protection concerns. It found the petitioners' schemes to be collective investment schemes requiring SEBI registration, directing SEBI to conclude its inquiry promptly. The court refused to unseal the premises, considering the need to protect investors, but allowed the petitioners to challenge any adverse orders following SEBI's investigation. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196654