<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 699 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196653</link>
    <description>Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act permits affidavit evidence as examination-in-chief in cheque dishonour prosecutions, consistent with the Act&#039;s summary-trial scheme for speedy disposal. The right under Section 145(2) to summon the deponent is confined to securing cross-examination or clarification, not to compel the complainant or any other witness to repeat examination-in-chief in court. The expression &quot;any person&quot; was not read as creating a blanket entitlement to re-tender affidavit evidence. This interpretation preserves the procedural economy intended by Chapter XVII and avoids delay in the trial process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:09:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 699 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196653</link>
      <description>Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act permits affidavit evidence as examination-in-chief in cheque dishonour prosecutions, consistent with the Act&#039;s summary-trial scheme for speedy disposal. The right under Section 145(2) to summon the deponent is confined to securing cross-examination or clarification, not to compel the complainant or any other witness to repeat examination-in-chief in court. The expression &quot;any person&quot; was not read as creating a blanket entitlement to re-tender affidavit evidence. This interpretation preserves the procedural economy intended by Chapter XVII and avoids delay in the trial process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>