<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 699 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196653</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the Magistrate&#039;s decision to reject the application under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court clarified that the provision primarily grants the right to cross-examine, not to re-examine the complainant or witnesses who have already given evidence on affidavit. This interpretation aligns with the legislative intent to expedite the trial process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:09:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 699 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196653</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the Magistrate&#039;s decision to reject the application under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court clarified that the provision primarily grants the right to cross-examine, not to re-examine the complainant or witnesses who have already given evidence on affidavit. This interpretation aligns with the legislative intent to expedite the trial process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>