<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1653 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196652</link>
    <description>The court admitted the winding up petition against the respondent-company for non-payment of dues, amounting to approximately Rs. 2.9 crores. Despite settlement talks and the respondent&#039;s demonstration of restructuring efforts, including a Techno-Economic Viability Report, the court found insufficient progress in repaying the debt. Consequently, the court directed the advertisement of the winding up petition in newspapers and deferred the appointment of a provisional liquidator to allow for further revival talks or settlement proposals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:41:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1653 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196652</link>
      <description>The court admitted the winding up petition against the respondent-company for non-payment of dues, amounting to approximately Rs. 2.9 crores. Despite settlement talks and the respondent&#039;s demonstration of restructuring efforts, including a Techno-Economic Viability Report, the court found insufficient progress in repaying the debt. Consequently, the court directed the advertisement of the winding up petition in newspapers and deferred the appointment of a provisional liquidator to allow for further revival talks or settlement proposals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>