<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (12) TMI 194 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196648</link>
    <description>The High Court of Rajasthan held that the State Government was not liable for the actions of its employee, Harpal Singh, who caused a fatal accident while driving a government jeep. Despite being initially within the scope of his employment, Harpal Singh&#039;s subsequent actions were deemed beyond his duties, absolving the State Government of vicarious liability. The court applied the principle of volenti non fit injuria, emphasizing that the passengers willingly accepted the risk by boarding the jeep driven by an intoxicated Harpal Singh. Citing relevant case law, the court dismissed the appeals against the State Government with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:53:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (12) TMI 194 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196648</link>
      <description>The High Court of Rajasthan held that the State Government was not liable for the actions of its employee, Harpal Singh, who caused a fatal accident while driving a government jeep. Despite being initially within the scope of his employment, Harpal Singh&#039;s subsequent actions were deemed beyond his duties, absolving the State Government of vicarious liability. The court applied the principle of volenti non fit injuria, emphasizing that the passengers willingly accepted the risk by boarding the jeep driven by an intoxicated Harpal Singh. Citing relevant case law, the court dismissed the appeals against the State Government with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>