<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 615 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196646</link>
    <description>Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act permits interim attachment in aid of arbitration, and the procedural principles of Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure may guide that discretion even though the Code is not bodily incorporated into the Act. The Court held that the decisive inquiry is whether the facts justify attachment on grounds of justice and discretion. A reference to Order 38 Rule 5 does not, by itself, vitiate the order refusing attachment. The refusal to grant attachment was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:30:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 615 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196646</link>
      <description>Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act permits interim attachment in aid of arbitration, and the procedural principles of Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure may guide that discretion even though the Code is not bodily incorporated into the Act. The Court held that the decisive inquiry is whether the facts justify attachment on grounds of justice and discretion. A reference to Order 38 Rule 5 does not, by itself, vitiate the order refusing attachment. The refusal to grant attachment was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>