https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196645 Allegations that sale deeds were forged and fabricated to support a fraudulent claim over property disclosed a prima facie offence, so the FIR and ongoing investigation could not be quashed at the threshold under Section 482 CrPC or Article 226. The Court held that whether the documents were forged was a matter for investigation, and interference is warranted only in rare cases where no offence is made out or the complaint is frivolous. The bar under Section 195(1)(b)(ii) CrPC did not apply because the alleged forgery occurred before the documents were produced in court; that provision is attracted only to forgery committed after a document enters court custody. en-us Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:29:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196645 Allegations that sale deeds were forged and fabricated to support a fraudulent claim over property disclosed a prima facie offence, so the FIR and ongoing investigation could not be quashed at the threshold under Section 482 CrPC or Article 226. The Court held that whether the documents were forged was a matter for investigation, and interference is warranted only in rare cases where no offence is made out or the complaint is frivolous. The bar under Section 195(1)(b)(ii) CrPC did not apply because the alleged forgery occurred before the documents were produced in court; that provision is attracted only to forgery committed after a document enters court custody. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196645