<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 940 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196645</link>
    <description>The High Court&#039;s decision to quash the FIR and ongoing investigation under sections 468 and 471 IPC, based on allegations of forged sale deeds, was overturned. The appeal stemmed from allegations that legal advisers/Senior Managers used forged documents to claim land ownership. The Sub-Registrar confirmed the fraudulent nature of the sale deeds. The Court held that the allegations constituted an offense warranting investigation, emphasizing the need for a strong factual basis in complaints during ongoing investigations. The decision highlighted the limited application of section 195 Cr.P.C. regarding document forgery in court custody, allowing the investigation to proceed without hindrance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:29:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 940 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196645</link>
      <description>The High Court&#039;s decision to quash the FIR and ongoing investigation under sections 468 and 471 IPC, based on allegations of forged sale deeds, was overturned. The appeal stemmed from allegations that legal advisers/Senior Managers used forged documents to claim land ownership. The Sub-Registrar confirmed the fraudulent nature of the sale deeds. The Court held that the allegations constituted an offense warranting investigation, emphasizing the need for a strong factual basis in complaints during ongoing investigations. The decision highlighted the limited application of section 195 Cr.P.C. regarding document forgery in court custody, allowing the investigation to proceed without hindrance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>