https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196644 Interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was found unwarranted where the alleged commission claim arose from a separate agreement with another entity, while the helicopter supply contract was independently negotiated and contained no agency or intercession arrangement. The prior agency agreement had also become void on cessation of the principal's activity, and no binding supply contract existed on that basis. Relief was further declined because the respondent, being a state-owned undertaking with substantial assets, posed no credible enforcement risk and the requested restraint was treated as akin to attachment before judgment without the exceptional justification required. en-us Tue, 25 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196644 Interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was found unwarranted where the alleged commission claim arose from a separate agreement with another entity, while the helicopter supply contract was independently negotiated and contained no agency or intercession arrangement. The prior agency agreement had also become void on cessation of the principal's activity, and no binding supply contract existed on that basis. Relief was further declined because the respondent, being a state-owned undertaking with substantial assets, posed no credible enforcement risk and the requested restraint was treated as akin to attachment before judgment without the exceptional justification required. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196644