https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196644 The Court dismissed the petition seeking an injunction against a Russian State-owned Company for commission payment, finding no privity of contract between the parties. The Court deemed the injunction premature, emphasizing that commission is typically due post-contract completion. It declined interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, citing complexities in the commission claim and the necessity for arbitration to determine entitlement. The Court highlighted the lack of immediate threat to the respondent's assets and dismissed the petition, emphasizing the need for arbitration to resolve the dispute definitively. en-us Tue, 25 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196644 The Court dismissed the petition seeking an injunction against a Russian State-owned Company for commission payment, finding no privity of contract between the parties. The Court deemed the injunction premature, emphasizing that commission is typically due post-contract completion. It declined interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, citing complexities in the commission claim and the necessity for arbitration to determine entitlement. The Court highlighted the lack of immediate threat to the respondent's assets and dismissed the petition, emphasizing the need for arbitration to resolve the dispute definitively. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196644