<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 531 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352262</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the assessee&#039;s right to claim interest expenses against interest income based on the direct nexus between the funds used for lending activities and the interest income earned. The Tribunal also supported the computation of interest expenses as per Rule 8D, finding no grounds for interference with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:29:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 531 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352262</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the assessee&#039;s right to claim interest expenses against interest income based on the direct nexus between the funds used for lending activities and the interest income earned. The Tribunal also supported the computation of interest expenses as per Rule 8D, finding no grounds for interference with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>