<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 530 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352261</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the disallowance of depreciation on a showroom and expenses under section 40a(ia) of the Income Tax Act to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence of bifurcation for depreciation purposes and reconsideration of the disallowances in light of legal provisions and precedents cited during the proceedings. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, setting aside the disallowances for further examination by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:29:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 530 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352261</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the disallowance of depreciation on a showroom and expenses under section 40a(ia) of the Income Tax Act to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence of bifurcation for depreciation purposes and reconsideration of the disallowances in light of legal provisions and precedents cited during the proceedings. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, setting aside the disallowances for further examination by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>