https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352245 The shift in the indirect tax regime from 1 July 2017 justified the State's decision to invite future contract offers excluding GST. Because no letter of acceptance had been issued, no concluded contract arose and the bidder acquired no vested or enforceable right to insist on acceptance of its offer. In the absence of a concluded contract, and with no material showing the decision to be illegal or arbitrary, judicial interference was not warranted. The State's approach in not acting upon tenders invited between 1 July 2017 and 5 August 2017 was therefore upheld. en-us Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352245 The shift in the indirect tax regime from 1 July 2017 justified the State's decision to invite future contract offers excluding GST. Because no letter of acceptance had been issued, no concluded contract arose and the bidder acquired no vested or enforceable right to insist on acceptance of its offer. In the absence of a concluded contract, and with no material showing the decision to be illegal or arbitrary, judicial interference was not warranted. The State's approach in not acting upon tenders invited between 1 July 2017 and 5 August 2017 was therefore upheld. Case-Laws GST Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352245