<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 507 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant Cenvat credit benefit on tyres as they were considered inputs for credit availment. The matter of interest demand on capital goods was remanded for verification of credit utilization, with potential interest liability if not used for service tax payment. The issue of penalty imposition under Rule 15 was not explicitly addressed in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:43:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 507 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant Cenvat credit benefit on tyres as they were considered inputs for credit availment. The matter of interest demand on capital goods was remanded for verification of credit utilization, with potential interest liability if not used for service tax payment. The issue of penalty imposition under Rule 15 was not explicitly addressed in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>