<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 503 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the appellant&#039;s application under the Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998, due to discrepancies in the declaration. The appellant failed to disclose material facts, including the re-credited amount just before filing the application, leading to non-compliance with scheme requirements. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments and dismissed the appeal on 27.11.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 503 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the appellant&#039;s application under the Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998, due to discrepancies in the declaration. The appellant failed to disclose material facts, including the re-credited amount just before filing the application, leading to non-compliance with scheme requirements. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments and dismissed the appeal on 27.11.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>