https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352232 The appeal was filed against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise regarding the clearance of MS Scrap without duty payment. The appellant claimed the scrap sold did not arise from capital goods on which credit was availed. The appeal was partly allowed, but a portion of the demand was upheld. The order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand to verify the origin of the MS scrap from dismantling capital goods procured before 01.04.1994 without availing cenvat credit. The appellant's claim required further evidence for verification. en-us Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:43:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352232 The appeal was filed against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise regarding the clearance of MS Scrap without duty payment. The appellant claimed the scrap sold did not arise from capital goods on which credit was availed. The appeal was partly allowed, but a portion of the demand was upheld. The order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand to verify the origin of the MS scrap from dismantling capital goods procured before 01.04.1994 without availing cenvat credit. The appellant's claim required further evidence for verification. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352232