<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 492 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalty imposed on a company and its General Manager for excess aluminum scrap found in the factory premises. Despite the scrap not being recorded in the official register, its presence in the private production stock register led the Tribunal to deem the confiscation unsustainable. The penalties were overturned as the goods were internally documented, emphasizing the significance of accurate accounting practices to avoid such consequences in excise matters. The judgment underscores the necessity of proper record-keeping to prevent confiscation and penalties in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:42:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 492 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalty imposed on a company and its General Manager for excess aluminum scrap found in the factory premises. Despite the scrap not being recorded in the official register, its presence in the private production stock register led the Tribunal to deem the confiscation unsustainable. The penalties were overturned as the goods were internally documented, emphasizing the significance of accurate accounting practices to avoid such consequences in excise matters. The judgment underscores the necessity of proper record-keeping to prevent confiscation and penalties in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>