<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 489 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352220</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad held that sales commission paid to agents is not eligible for CENVAT credit as an &#039;input service&#039; under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, based on precedents and interpretations. The Tribunal acknowledged conflicting views on the issue, particularly concerning a retrospective amendment allowing such credit. Pending a High Court decision on this matter, the Tribunal opted for a cautious approach, deferring any recovery or refund actions and granting parties the liberty to return post-High Court judgment. The decision prioritizes consistency with the higher forum&#039;s forthcoming ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:42:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 489 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352220</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad held that sales commission paid to agents is not eligible for CENVAT credit as an &#039;input service&#039; under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, based on precedents and interpretations. The Tribunal acknowledged conflicting views on the issue, particularly concerning a retrospective amendment allowing such credit. Pending a High Court decision on this matter, the Tribunal opted for a cautious approach, deferring any recovery or refund actions and granting parties the liberty to return post-High Court judgment. The decision prioritizes consistency with the higher forum&#039;s forthcoming ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>