<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 487 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352218</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand for clandestine removal of goods, adjusted the penalty in accordance with Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and directed the appellant to pay the recalculated penalty and interest within a specified timeframe. The judgment emphasizes aligning penalty liabilities with changes in duty demands to ensure fair and consistent application of the law in excise duty cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:42:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 487 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352218</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand for clandestine removal of goods, adjusted the penalty in accordance with Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and directed the appellant to pay the recalculated penalty and interest within a specified timeframe. The judgment emphasizes aligning penalty liabilities with changes in duty demands to ensure fair and consistent application of the law in excise duty cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>