<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 471 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions made by the AO for AY 2010-11 and AY 2011-12, emphasizing consistency in judicial decisions and fair interpretation of tax laws. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, highlighting the retrospective effect of the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) and maintaining consistency with earlier rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 08:26:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 471 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions made by the AO for AY 2010-11 and AY 2011-12, emphasizing consistency in judicial decisions and fair interpretation of tax laws. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, highlighting the retrospective effect of the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) and maintaining consistency with earlier rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>