<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 461 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352192</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, dismissing the appeal as the goods exported and reimported were found to be significantly transformed, leading to the denial of duty exemption claim under Section 20 of the Customs Act, 1962. The court emphasized that the goods were not the same due to the substantial changes in form and nature during processing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 461 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352192</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, dismissing the appeal as the goods exported and reimported were found to be significantly transformed, leading to the denial of duty exemption claim under Section 20 of the Customs Act, 1962. The court emphasized that the goods were not the same due to the substantial changes in form and nature during processing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>