<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 455 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352186</link>
    <description>A rehabilitation scheme under SICA binds State Governments only if the statutory consent mechanism in Section 19 is satisfied; where consent is withheld or not properly obtained, the exemption from VAT, sales tax and electricity duty is not enforceable against the States, and Section 32 cannot override that requirement. The scheme also distinguished exemption from refund: it did not permit recovery of taxes already collected from customers and deposited with the State, and such a claim was defeated by unjust enrichment. The article therefore states that refund was not available on the facts and the scheme could not be used to reclaim collected taxes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 08:19:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 455 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352186</link>
      <description>A rehabilitation scheme under SICA binds State Governments only if the statutory consent mechanism in Section 19 is satisfied; where consent is withheld or not properly obtained, the exemption from VAT, sales tax and electricity duty is not enforceable against the States, and Section 32 cannot override that requirement. The scheme also distinguished exemption from refund: it did not permit recovery of taxes already collected from customers and deposited with the State, and such a claim was defeated by unjust enrichment. The article therefore states that refund was not available on the facts and the scheme could not be used to reclaim collected taxes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>