<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 438 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352169</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal deferred a decision on the eligibility of CENVAT credit on service tax paid on sales commission pending the High Court of Gujarat&#039;s verdict. The Tribunal granted both parties liberty to approach after the High Court&#039;s decision, with no recovery or refund actions during this period, aligning with previous practices. This cautious approach ensures compliance with the High Court&#039;s jurisdictional rulings and maintains the status quo until clarity is provided by the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 08:17:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 438 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352169</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal deferred a decision on the eligibility of CENVAT credit on service tax paid on sales commission pending the High Court of Gujarat&#039;s verdict. The Tribunal granted both parties liberty to approach after the High Court&#039;s decision, with no recovery or refund actions during this period, aligning with previous practices. This cautious approach ensures compliance with the High Court&#039;s jurisdictional rulings and maintains the status quo until clarity is provided by the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>