<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 432 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352163</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and Order-in-Original in a Central Excise case, ruling that the show cause notices demanding differential Central Excise Duty were not sustainable as they were the third notices on the same issue, contrary to the Nizam Sugar Factory judgment. The appellant was granted consequential relief as per law, with the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 08:17:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 432 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352163</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and Order-in-Original in a Central Excise case, ruling that the show cause notices demanding differential Central Excise Duty were not sustainable as they were the third notices on the same issue, contrary to the Nizam Sugar Factory judgment. The appellant was granted consequential relief as per law, with the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>