https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196617 Where a litigant has already pursued an efficacious statutory remedy and multiple parallel proceedings over the same property dispute, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 may properly be declined, especially when the relief depends on disputed facts and matters within the statutory forum's competence. Under the Registration Act, 1908, a registering authority has no implied power to cancel a document after registration in the absence of express statutory authority. Unilateral presentation of an extinguishment deed does not, by itself, render the registration void, because the registrar's role is administrative and does not extend to adjudicating title or the legality of the underlying transaction. en-us Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196617 Where a litigant has already pursued an efficacious statutory remedy and multiple parallel proceedings over the same property dispute, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 may properly be declined, especially when the relief depends on disputed facts and matters within the statutory forum's competence. Under the Registration Act, 1908, a registering authority has no implied power to cancel a document after registration in the absence of express statutory authority. Unilateral presentation of an extinguishment deed does not, by itself, render the registration void, because the registrar's role is administrative and does not extend to adjudicating title or the legality of the underlying transaction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196617