https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196611 In habeas corpus proceedings, detention is assessed with reference to the custody existing when the Court examines the return, and continued confinement is not vitiated merely because one basis of custody fails if another valid judicial remand independently supports detention. The text discusses alleged non-communication of grounds of arrest under Article 22(1), non-production before a Magistrate within time under Article 22(2), and the effect of a challenge to preventive remand under Section 117(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It states that preventive remand was unsustainable for want of compliance with the preliminary statutory steps, but separate remand orders in criminal cases under Sections 143 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code sustained lawful custody. en-us Tue, 13 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:55:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196611 In habeas corpus proceedings, detention is assessed with reference to the custody existing when the Court examines the return, and continued confinement is not vitiated merely because one basis of custody fails if another valid judicial remand independently supports detention. The text discusses alleged non-communication of grounds of arrest under Article 22(1), non-production before a Magistrate within time under Article 22(2), and the effect of a challenge to preventive remand under Section 117(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It states that preventive remand was unsustainable for want of compliance with the preliminary statutory steps, but separate remand orders in criminal cases under Sections 143 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code sustained lawful custody. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196611