https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196609 In an arrest on suspicion of a cognizable offence, section 50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is satisfied if the arrested person is effectively informed of the grounds of arrest as soon as may be; Article 22(5) on preventive detention does not govern that requirement. On the facts, oral communication, disclosure in the remand application, and service of the panchnama within 24 hours supported compliance. The Court also stated that even assumed non-compliance would not by itself render the initial arrest illegal. The bail order based solely on alleged breach of section 50 was therefore unsustainable. en-us Mon, 14 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:11:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196609 In an arrest on suspicion of a cognizable offence, section 50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is satisfied if the arrested person is effectively informed of the grounds of arrest as soon as may be; Article 22(5) on preventive detention does not govern that requirement. On the facts, oral communication, disclosure in the remand application, and service of the panchnama within 24 hours supported compliance. The Court also stated that even assumed non-compliance would not by itself render the initial arrest illegal. The bail order based solely on alleged breach of section 50 was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196609