<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 680 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196608</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka rejected an application for approval of a bid in an auction for a property under liquidation. The Court determined that the auction purchaser did not acquire absolute title to the property as it was in a leasehold condition, not owned by the company under liquidation. The Court directed the refund of the earnest money deposit to the auction purchaser as they were unwilling to proceed with the purchase under the leasehold terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 680 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196608</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka rejected an application for approval of a bid in an auction for a property under liquidation. The Court determined that the auction purchaser did not acquire absolute title to the property as it was in a leasehold condition, not owned by the company under liquidation. The Court directed the refund of the earnest money deposit to the auction purchaser as they were unwilling to proceed with the purchase under the leasehold terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>