https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196606 The Board dismissed the petition as the petitioners failed to establish oppression and mismanagement under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The petitioners' acquiescence to the alleged actions over the years and delayed challenge were noted. However, the Board offered the petitioners an exit from the company with a fair valuation of their shares and ensured they receive all due pay and allowances. en-us Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196606 The Board dismissed the petition as the petitioners failed to establish oppression and mismanagement under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The petitioners' acquiescence to the alleged actions over the years and delayed challenge were noted. However, the Board offered the petitioners an exit from the company with a fair valuation of their shares and ensured they receive all due pay and allowances. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196606