<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1228 - COMPANY LAW BOARD CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196605</link>
    <description>The Company Petition was dismissed as not maintainable under Section 399 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioners were found not to be shareholders at the time of filing the petition, and the Bench lacked jurisdiction to address issues of fraud and forgery. Consequently, all interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1228 - COMPANY LAW BOARD CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196605</link>
      <description>The Company Petition was dismissed as not maintainable under Section 399 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioners were found not to be shareholders at the time of filing the petition, and the Bench lacked jurisdiction to address issues of fraud and forgery. Consequently, all interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>