https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196601 The revisional power under section 34(4) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 is supervisory and broader than section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, but it is not an appellate rehearing. It permits interference only where the impugned order is not according to law in the substantive sense and causes a miscarriage of justice; mere procedural irregularity is insufficient. A revision is maintainable only against non-appealable orders that directly affect substantive rights or liabilities under the Rent Act or other substantive law. Purely procedural CPC orders, such as those on amendment, discovery, adjournment, costs, or time, are generally not revisable unless they affect the foundation of the case. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Dec 2017 15:32:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196601 The revisional power under section 34(4) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 is supervisory and broader than section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, but it is not an appellate rehearing. It permits interference only where the impugned order is not according to law in the substantive sense and causes a miscarriage of justice; mere procedural irregularity is insufficient. A revision is maintainable only against non-appealable orders that directly affect substantive rights or liabilities under the Rent Act or other substantive law. Purely procedural CPC orders, such as those on amendment, discovery, adjournment, costs, or time, are generally not revisable unless they affect the foundation of the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196601