https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196600 The court dismissed the petition, finding that the Examinations Committee did not violate the principles of natural justice in the procedure followed. The court held that the material before the Committee was adequate to find the petitioner guilty of using unfair means based on circumstantial evidence. Additionally, the court concluded that there was no discrimination in the punishment imposed on the petitioner compared to another candidate. The petition was dismissed, and the stay order was discharged, with no costs awarded. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:56:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196600 The court dismissed the petition, finding that the Examinations Committee did not violate the principles of natural justice in the procedure followed. The court held that the material before the Committee was adequate to find the petitioner guilty of using unfair means based on circumstantial evidence. Additionally, the court concluded that there was no discrimination in the punishment imposed on the petitioner compared to another candidate. The petition was dismissed, and the stay order was discharged, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196600