<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1066 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196597</link>
    <description>The High Court considered the legality of an order by SEBI under specific provisions of the SEBI Act and Regulations. The Court found that SEBI had not definitively determined if the petitioners&#039; business constituted a Collective Investment Scheme. It agreed with the petitioners that all statutory requirements must be met to classify a scheme as such. As an interim measure, the Court suspended certain directions in SEBI&#039;s order, allowing the petitioners to continue operations with restrictions. This decision emphasizes the need for fulfilling statutory criteria and questions SEBI&#039;s jurisdiction pending further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:35:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1066 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196597</link>
      <description>The High Court considered the legality of an order by SEBI under specific provisions of the SEBI Act and Regulations. The Court found that SEBI had not definitively determined if the petitioners&#039; business constituted a Collective Investment Scheme. It agreed with the petitioners that all statutory requirements must be met to classify a scheme as such. As an interim measure, the Court suspended certain directions in SEBI&#039;s order, allowing the petitioners to continue operations with restrictions. This decision emphasizes the need for fulfilling statutory criteria and questions SEBI&#039;s jurisdiction pending further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>