<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1396 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196587</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO/TPO to recompute the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) of international transactions with the assessee as the tested party. The issue of disallowance of depreciation on leased vehicles was remitted to the AO for fresh examination. The addition of interest on sticky loans was disallowed based on earlier Tribunal decisions and a Supreme Court judgment. The order was pronounced on 08.07.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2018 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1396 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196587</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO/TPO to recompute the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) of international transactions with the assessee as the tested party. The issue of disallowance of depreciation on leased vehicles was remitted to the AO for fresh examination. The addition of interest on sticky loans was disallowed based on earlier Tribunal decisions and a Supreme Court judgment. The order was pronounced on 08.07.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>