<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Commissioner can condone delay in Section 264 applications without relying on Limitation Act Section 5.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37114</link>
    <description>Applications u/s 264 for revision in favor of assessee - Condonation of delay - Proviso to Sub-Section (3) of Section 264 confers a statutory power on the Commissioner to condone the delay. Therefore it was not necessary for the Commissioner to have taken recourse to Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:52:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:52:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Commissioner can condone delay in Section 264 applications without relying on Limitation Act Section 5.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37114</link>
      <description>Applications u/s 264 for revision in favor of assessee - Condonation of delay - Proviso to Sub-Section (3) of Section 264 confers a statutory power on the Commissioner to condone the delay. Therefore it was not necessary for the Commissioner to have taken recourse to Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:52:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>