<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 425 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352156</link>
    <description>The High Court partly allowed the Writ Petitions, setting aside the orders and condoning the delay in filing Revision Applications under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act. The matters were remanded to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication on merits, with directions to decide expeditiously. All contentions on the merits of the Revision Applications were kept open for further consideration by the Revisional Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 425 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352156</link>
      <description>The High Court partly allowed the Writ Petitions, setting aside the orders and condoning the delay in filing Revision Applications under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act. The matters were remanded to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication on merits, with directions to decide expeditiously. All contentions on the merits of the Revision Applications were kept open for further consideration by the Revisional Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>