<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 397 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352128</link>
    <description>The tribunal found no genuine dispute between the parties and admitted the petition, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. Emphasizing the distinction between insolvency proceedings and civil suits, the tribunal aimed to protect creditors&#039; rights under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 397 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352128</link>
      <description>The tribunal found no genuine dispute between the parties and admitted the petition, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. Emphasizing the distinction between insolvency proceedings and civil suits, the tribunal aimed to protect creditors&#039; rights under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>