<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 393 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352124</link>
    <description>The court remanded the complaint back to the JMFC for adjudication afresh on merits, directing the parties to appear before the JMFC on 22nd January 2018. The court emphasized that the complaint filed within one month of the accrual of the cause of action based on the second dishonour was valid and maintainable under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 393 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352124</link>
      <description>The court remanded the complaint back to the JMFC for adjudication afresh on merits, directing the parties to appear before the JMFC on 22nd January 2018. The court emphasized that the complaint filed within one month of the accrual of the cause of action based on the second dishonour was valid and maintainable under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>