<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the significance of communication in computing the limitation period for refund claims on provisional assessments. It held that the limitation period starts from the date of communication of the finalization order to the appellant, not just the finalization date. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision, remanding the case for further consideration on the refund issue, including undue enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:15:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the significance of communication in computing the limitation period for refund claims on provisional assessments. It held that the limitation period starts from the date of communication of the finalization order to the appellant, not just the finalization date. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision, remanding the case for further consideration on the refund issue, including undue enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>