<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 375 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352106</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of paper sheets valued at Rs. 2,03,800, ruling that the goods were not identified as excisable products and the basis for confiscation was invalid. Additionally, the penalty of Rs. 10,000 imposed on the Manager was overturned as it was not invoked or alleged in the notice, rendering it legally unsustainable. The appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellants, with the confiscation and penalty being set aside based on the legal analysis and findings in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:15:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 375 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352106</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of paper sheets valued at Rs. 2,03,800, ruling that the goods were not identified as excisable products and the basis for confiscation was invalid. Additionally, the penalty of Rs. 10,000 imposed on the Manager was overturned as it was not invoked or alleged in the notice, rendering it legally unsustainable. The appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellants, with the confiscation and penalty being set aside based on the legal analysis and findings in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>