<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 374 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352105</link>
    <description>TMQ was treated as an in-process premix used for animal feed supplementation, so it fell under Heading 2302 as a preparation of a kind used in animal feeding. The test report and cross-examination of the Chemical Examiner were found unreliable because the report was incomplete and did not clearly establish the nature of the sample. Classification under Heading 2941.30 as tetracyclines and their salts was rejected because the product could not be treated as an antibiotic derivative merely on assumptions drawn from the report. The classification issue was also considered covered by the Larger Bench decision relied on in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 374 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352105</link>
      <description>TMQ was treated as an in-process premix used for animal feed supplementation, so it fell under Heading 2302 as a preparation of a kind used in animal feeding. The test report and cross-examination of the Chemical Examiner were found unreliable because the report was incomplete and did not clearly establish the nature of the sample. Classification under Heading 2941.30 as tetracyclines and their salts was rejected because the product could not be treated as an antibiotic derivative merely on assumptions drawn from the report. The classification issue was also considered covered by the Larger Bench decision relied on in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>