https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196584 Where disciplinary punishment is founded on UPSC advice, that advice must be furnished to the delinquent employee before the final decision so an effective representation can be made. Rule 32 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 refers to supplying the advice with the final order, but the governing natural justice principle requires advance disclosure when the advice is relied on as material supporting punishment. The Court treated S. K. Kapoor as correctly stating the law and held the contrary view in T. V. Patel per incuriam for not noticing binding earlier authority. Non-supply at the pre-decisional stage violates natural justice. en-us Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:40:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196584 Where disciplinary punishment is founded on UPSC advice, that advice must be furnished to the delinquent employee before the final decision so an effective representation can be made. Rule 32 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 refers to supplying the advice with the final order, but the governing natural justice principle requires advance disclosure when the advice is relied on as material supporting punishment. The Court treated S. K. Kapoor as correctly stating the law and held the contrary view in T. V. Patel per incuriam for not noticing binding earlier authority. Non-supply at the pre-decisional stage violates natural justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196584