https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196577 Detention orders remained executable after the original District Magistrate's transfer, and delay before arrest did not invalidate the order in the circumstances. Grounds of detention had to disclose the factual basis of satisfaction under Article 22(5), subject to the public-interest exception in Article 22(6); although one ground was vague, the other grounds were sufficiently particularised and sustained the detention. The detaining authority could independently treat incitement to an illegal strike as a preventive detention ground, even without a prior industrial court declaration of illegality. Publication of unauthorised objectionable news sheets, coupled with exhortation to violent revolt, could also justify detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950. The detention was upheld. en-us Tue, 10 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:38:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196577 Detention orders remained executable after the original District Magistrate's transfer, and delay before arrest did not invalidate the order in the circumstances. Grounds of detention had to disclose the factual basis of satisfaction under Article 22(5), subject to the public-interest exception in Article 22(6); although one ground was vague, the other grounds were sufficiently particularised and sustained the detention. The detaining authority could independently treat incitement to an illegal strike as a preventive detention ground, even without a prior industrial court declaration of illegality. Publication of unauthorised objectionable news sheets, coupled with exhortation to violent revolt, could also justify detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950. The detention was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196577