https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196574 Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 was treated as severable, so any possible constitutional difficulty affecting peaceful picketing did not invalidate the provision to the extent it applied to intimidation-like conduct. The article also states that Article 22(1) is not satisfied by merely telling an arrested person the statutory section invoked; the grounds of arrest must be communicated with enough specificity to show the substance of the accusation and enable prompt legal steps. On the facts described, communication of only the section number was insufficient, making the detention unlawful. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:27:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196574 Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 was treated as severable, so any possible constitutional difficulty affecting peaceful picketing did not invalidate the provision to the extent it applied to intimidation-like conduct. The article also states that Article 22(1) is not satisfied by merely telling an arrested person the statutory section invoked; the grounds of arrest must be communicated with enough specificity to show the substance of the accusation and enable prompt legal steps. On the facts described, communication of only the section number was insufficient, making the detention unlawful. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Jul 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196574