https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196574 Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 contains severable forms of prohibited conduct, so any constitutional concern regarding peaceful picketing does not invalidate its application to alleged intimidation. The provision can therefore operate validly where the charge concerns intimidation rather than peaceful picketing. Article 22(1) requires prompt communication of the substance of the actual grounds of arrest; merely identifying a statutory provision that covers multiple forms of conduct is insufficient. Failure to disclose the specific allegation prevents meaningful pursuit of bail, habeas corpus, or defence and renders detention unlawful. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:27:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196574 Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 contains severable forms of prohibited conduct, so any constitutional concern regarding peaceful picketing does not invalidate its application to alleged intimidation. The provision can therefore operate validly where the charge concerns intimidation rather than peaceful picketing. Article 22(1) requires prompt communication of the substance of the actual grounds of arrest; merely identifying a statutory provision that covers multiple forms of conduct is insufficient. Failure to disclose the specific allegation prevents meaningful pursuit of bail, habeas corpus, or defence and renders detention unlawful. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Jul 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196574