<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1147 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196571</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeal filed by the Assessing Officer and treating the cross objections as infructuous. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to binding precedents, the Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee based on conflicting High Court judgments, ultimately favoring the assessee in the disallowance of TDS under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 16:15:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1147 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196571</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeal filed by the Assessing Officer and treating the cross objections as infructuous. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to binding precedents, the Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee based on conflicting High Court judgments, ultimately favoring the assessee in the disallowance of TDS under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>