<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 32 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10877</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, confirming that the lottery amount should be taxed equally among the three brothers in the assessment year 1989-90. The additions made under section 69 were rightly deleted due to the failure of the Assessing Officer to substantiate the claim that the ticket was purchased post-draw. Consequently, the wealth-tax assessment was also adjusted to reflect the correct distribution of the lottery amount. All seven appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 32 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10877</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, confirming that the lottery amount should be taxed equally among the three brothers in the assessment year 1989-90. The additions made under section 69 were rightly deleted due to the failure of the Assessing Officer to substantiate the claim that the ticket was purchased post-draw. Consequently, the wealth-tax assessment was also adjusted to reflect the correct distribution of the lottery amount. All seven appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>