https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196561 The court found in favor of the plaintiff, recognizing her proprietorship and extensive use of the trademark "Whole Foods," establishing its distinctiveness and secondary meaning. The court granted an ex-parte ad interim injunction against the defendants, confirming it as absolute due to potential consumer confusion. The defendants were restrained from using the trademark "Whole Foods" or any deceptively similar mark, with the option to modify their trademark to prevent confusion. The case was scheduled for further proceedings regarding document admission, denial, and issue framing. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Dec 2017 12:04:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196561 The court found in favor of the plaintiff, recognizing her proprietorship and extensive use of the trademark "Whole Foods," establishing its distinctiveness and secondary meaning. The court granted an ex-parte ad interim injunction against the defendants, confirming it as absolute due to potential consumer confusion. The defendants were restrained from using the trademark "Whole Foods" or any deceptively similar mark, with the option to modify their trademark to prevent confusion. The case was scheduled for further proceedings regarding document admission, denial, and issue framing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196561