<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 364 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352095</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restrict the addition of a specific amount to a lesser sum by applying a net profit rate of 5% instead of 8%, based on the appellant&#039;s historical net profit rates. The Court agreed that the 5% rate was appropriate, considering the appellant&#039;s past profits. Additionally, the Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of interest and other income additions, ruling that these amounts were integral to the contract business and should not be separately included in the income calculation. As a result, the appeal against the department was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 364 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352095</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restrict the addition of a specific amount to a lesser sum by applying a net profit rate of 5% instead of 8%, based on the appellant&#039;s historical net profit rates. The Court agreed that the 5% rate was appropriate, considering the appellant&#039;s past profits. Additionally, the Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of interest and other income additions, ruling that these amounts were integral to the contract business and should not be separately included in the income calculation. As a result, the appeal against the department was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>