<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 346 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352077</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee for both assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07, deleting the additions made by the AO under section 153A in the absence of incriminating material found during the search conducted on 19.01.2009. The tribunal emphasized that no additions can be made under section 153A without any incriminating material, as per the judgments in CIT Vs Kabul Chawla and Pr. CIT Vs Meeta Gutgutia.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:43:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 346 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352077</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee for both assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07, deleting the additions made by the AO under section 153A in the absence of incriminating material found during the search conducted on 19.01.2009. The tribunal emphasized that no additions can be made under section 153A without any incriminating material, as per the judgments in CIT Vs Kabul Chawla and Pr. CIT Vs Meeta Gutgutia.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>