<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 344 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352075</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal, affirming that the assessee qualifies as a charitable institution under section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act and is not engaged in commercial activities. The Tribunal rejected allegations of luxury item misuse and remanded the issue of adjustments to the Income and Expenditure account back to the CIT(A) for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:43:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 344 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352075</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal, affirming that the assessee qualifies as a charitable institution under section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act and is not engaged in commercial activities. The Tribunal rejected allegations of luxury item misuse and remanded the issue of adjustments to the Income and Expenditure account back to the CIT(A) for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>