<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Examines &quot;Reason to Believe&quot; in U.P. VAT Act Section 29 for Reassessment Validity in Tax Escapement Cases.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37090</link>
    <description>Validity of reassessment proceeding - Section 29 of the U.P. VAT Act, 2007 - interpretation of statute &#039;reason to believe&#039; - escapement from tax - deemed sale of construction material - In any case being reassessment proceedings, the burden was on the revenue to disclose material to establish otherwise. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:00:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:00:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Examines &quot;Reason to Believe&quot; in U.P. VAT Act Section 29 for Reassessment Validity in Tax Escapement Cases.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37090</link>
      <description>Validity of reassessment proceeding - Section 29 of the U.P. VAT Act, 2007 - interpretation of statute &#039;reason to believe&#039; - escapement from tax - deemed sale of construction material - In any case being reassessment proceedings, the burden was on the revenue to disclose material to establish otherwise. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:00:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>